Readings in contemporary criticism / edited by Isagani R. Cruz.
Material type: TextManila : De La Salle University, [1991]Description: 167 pages 28 cmContent type:- text
- volume
- PR 21 .R227 1991
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isagani R. Cruz Collection | Aklatang Emilio Aguinaldo-Information Resource Center | PR 21 .R227 1991 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 3IRC0000006555 |
Browsing Aklatang Emilio Aguinaldo-Information Resource Center shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||||
PQ 9698.13.O3546 .Al16 2014 The alchemist = (Ang alkemista) / | PR 21 .R227 1990 Readings in contemporary criticism / | PR 21 .R227 1990 Readings in contemporary criticism / | PR 21 .R227 1991 Readings in contemporary criticism / | PR 583 .Sa52 1979 Poetics : the imitation of action essays in interpretation / | PR 1109 .F4 1977 A survey of English literature. / | PR 1195.C47 .P192 2008 Paper boats and fireflies : children at play / |
Includes references.
With the proliferation of texts on Philippine literary materials it is easy to get lost in a wilderness of words. A more formidable problem is the clash in the perspectives through which scholars and critics have viewed their objects of study. Adding to the problem is the difficulty of ascertaining the critical presuppositions and biases that have shaped these texts, for in most cases these writers have not made explicit their basic assumptions. Moreover, a number of authors seem to have simultaneously appropriated the functions traditionally assigned to literary theory, literary history and literary criticism within the texts. Such is the excess of energy that seems to characterize present literary studies. This article proposes an overview of the major trends in contemporary literary studies, especially those done in Manila, and indicates the critical values and assumptions that have influenced these texts. Within this reading of critical texts, which is necessarily schematic, certain limitations will have to be imposed. Thus, this article concerns itself mostly with selected books published between 1970 and 1985. (Articles are used to reinforce some findings which have not been fully explored in book form.)
There are no comments on this title.