An Environmental analysis of the Graduate School of Education, Arts and Sciences (GSEAS) of De La Salle University-Dasmariñas / Felicidad O. Rodelas.
Material type:
TextPublication details: DLSU-D, Cavite : 2006Description: 213 leaves : tbl., ill. 28 cmSubject(s): Summary: 2) There is no significant difference that exists on the assessment of the groups of respondents in all the eleven areasSummary: 3) The administration, faculty and students moderately agreed on the strengths, opportunities and weaknesses of the GSEAS while disagreed on the threatsSummary: 4) On the profile of the feeder schools, it is revealed that there are more teachers who enrolled and who finished the graduate and post graduate studies in other schools than in DLSU-D and there are more teachers who have not started enrolling in graduate and post-graduate studiesSummary: and 5) Among the most common reasons why the faculty of the feeder schools enrolled in other schools were low tuition fee, highly qualified faculty, accessible to the students, enough school equipment and facilities and not too strict with tuition fee payment. Recommendations of the study includes the improvement on the areas of faculty, human and physical resources, educational program, instructional standards, student services, library, research activities, extension services, accreditation and self-assessment.Summary: The focus of the study was to analyze the internal and external environments of the the GSEAS that have potential impact on its future. Respondents of the study include the administrators, faculty members and students of of GSEAS. The survey method was employed through the use of self-made questionnaire as a tool for gathering data. The statistical tools employed in the study includes percentage, mean, standard deviation and analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the light of the findings, the following conclusions were drawn: 1) The status of the GSEAS in terms of eleven areas was rated differently the the three groups of respondents. The areas of Administration and Management got the highest rank of to a Very Great Extent while other areas were rated to a Great Extent
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archives and Special Collection | Aklatang Emilio Aguinaldo-Information Resource Center | ARCH FP COE 46 2006 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 3ARCH200500604 |
Browsing Aklatang Emilio Aguinaldo-Information Resource Center shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
2) There is no significant difference that exists on the assessment of the groups of respondents in all the eleven areas
3) The administration, faculty and students moderately agreed on the strengths, opportunities and weaknesses of the GSEAS while disagreed on the threats
4) On the profile of the feeder schools, it is revealed that there are more teachers who enrolled and who finished the graduate and post graduate studies in other schools than in DLSU-D and there are more teachers who have not started enrolling in graduate and post-graduate studies
and 5) Among the most common reasons why the faculty of the feeder schools enrolled in other schools were low tuition fee, highly qualified faculty, accessible to the students, enough school equipment and facilities and not too strict with tuition fee payment. Recommendations of the study includes the improvement on the areas of faculty, human and physical resources, educational program, instructional standards, student services, library, research activities, extension services, accreditation and self-assessment.
The focus of the study was to analyze the internal and external environments of the the GSEAS that have potential impact on its future. Respondents of the study include the administrators, faculty members and students of of GSEAS. The survey method was employed through the use of self-made questionnaire as a tool for gathering data. The statistical tools employed in the study includes percentage, mean, standard deviation and analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the light of the findings, the following conclusions were drawn: 1) The status of the GSEAS in terms of eleven areas was rated differently the the three groups of respondents. The areas of Administration and Management got the highest rank of to a Very Great Extent while other areas were rated to a Great Extent
There are no comments on this title.
