Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Conjoining meanings : semantics without truth values / Paul M. Pietroski.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Publisher: Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press, 2018Edition: First editionDescription: x, 393 pages ; 24 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9780198812722
Other title:
  • Semantics without truth values
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • P 99.4 .P618 2018
Contents:
ch. zero Overture -- ch. one Locating meanings -- ch. two Introducing concepts -- ch. three Invention and satisfaction -- ch. four Truth or understanding -- ch. five Events and framing -- ch. six Massively monadic, potentially plural -- ch. seven Minimal semantic instructions -- ch. eight Reprise.
Summary: "Humans naturally acquire languages that connect meanings with pronunciations. Paul M. Pietroski presents an account of these distinctive languages as generative procedures that respect substantive constraints. Children acquire meaningful lexical items that can be combined, in certain ways, to form meaningful complex expressions. This raises questions about what meanings are, how they can be combined, and what kinds of meanings lexical items can have. According to Pietroski, meanings are neither concepts nor extensions, and sentences do not have truth conditions. He argues that meanings are composable instructions for how to access and assemble concepts of a special sort. More specifically, phrasal meanings are instructions for how to build monadic concepts (a.k.a. mental predicates) that are massively conjunctive, while lexical meanings are instructions for how to fetch concepts that are monadic or dyadic. This allows for polysemy, since a lexical item can be linked to an address that is shared by a family of fetchable concepts. But the posited combinatorial operations are limited and limiting. They impose severe restrictions on which concepts can be fetched for purposes of semantic composition. Correspondingly, Pietroski argues that in lexicalization, available representations are often used to introduce concepts that can be combined via the relevant operations."-- Back cover.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Graduate Studies Graduate Studies DLSU-D GRADUATE STUDIES Graduate Studies Graduate Studies P 99.4 .P618 2018 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 3CIR2018067138

Includes bibliographical references (pages 363-380) and indexes.

Machine generated contents note: ch. zero Overture -- ch. one Locating meanings -- ch. two Introducing concepts -- ch. three Invention and satisfaction -- ch. four Truth or understanding -- ch. five Events and framing -- ch. six Massively monadic, potentially plural -- ch. seven Minimal semantic instructions -- ch. eight Reprise.

"Humans naturally acquire languages that connect meanings with pronunciations. Paul M. Pietroski presents an account of these distinctive languages as generative procedures that respect substantive constraints. Children acquire meaningful lexical items that can be combined, in certain ways, to form meaningful complex expressions. This raises questions about what meanings are, how they can be combined, and what kinds of meanings lexical items can have. According to Pietroski, meanings are neither concepts nor extensions, and sentences do not have truth conditions. He argues that meanings are composable instructions for how to access and assemble concepts of a special sort. More specifically, phrasal meanings are instructions for how to build monadic concepts (a.k.a. mental predicates) that are massively conjunctive, while lexical meanings are instructions for how to fetch concepts that are monadic or dyadic. This allows for polysemy, since a lexical item can be linked to an address that is shared by a family of fetchable concepts. But the posited combinatorial operations are limited and limiting. They impose severe restrictions on which concepts can be fetched for purposes of semantic composition. Correspondingly, Pietroski argues that in lexicalization, available representations are often used to introduce concepts that can be combined via the relevant operations."-- Back cover.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.