000			02817nam a2200253Ia 4500
001			318527
003			0000000000
005			20211104080915.0
008			090210s1996 000 0 eng d
020			_a9715420974
040			_erda
050			_aDS 675.8.B7 _b.Ag74 1996
100			_aAgoncillo, Teodoro A. _934494
245		4	_aThe revolt of the masses : _bthe story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan / _cTeodoro A. Agoncillo
264			_aQuezon City : _bUniversity of the Philippines Press, _c1996
300			_axiv, 452 pgaes : _bill.ustrations _c22 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
520			_aIn Dealing with Andres Bonifacio and the Katipunan, I have laid more emphasis on the latter than on its founder and organizer, firstly, because of the dearth of materials on his life, and secondly, because it is my belief that Bonifacio can best be seen and appreciated against the backdrop of the revolutionary society. He could not been greater than Katipunan. Nor could he have risen above it. To understand him, one must understand the Katipunan. He looms great because of the society. He must, therefore, be seen in and through the Katipunan, and this method of unraveling the thin and scattered threads of his life is valid only because of the lack of materials. In examining my sources of information, I have adopted the attitude of friendly hostility. It has been my experience that most of the errors in the difficult task of interpretation-which, after all, is the most important in any book-spring from the scholar's uncritical attitude. He takes for granted that the fame of an author is sufficient guaranty of reliability and competence. Such mental outlook smacks of hypocrisy and cowardice. I have, therefore, dismissed this line of reasoning as inadequate. In this book, I have subjected my sources to a severe scrutiny, looked for loopholes, inconsistencies, and inaccuracies in order to arrive at a balanced conclusion. Ricarte, for instance, hitherto, regarded as incontrovertible, is, after a careful examination, not always accurate and reliable. So is General Pio del Pilar. So are certain documents on the trial and death of Bonifacio. And so are some of the opinions expressed by the great scholars Epifanio de los Santos and Teodoro M. Kalaw. I shall probably hear loud protests and whispered innuendos, but I invite the potential objectors to my method to read my Notes carefully, for in them I have embodied the reasons for repudiating some of the claims of famous scholars, for dismissing this authority and accepting that document.
650			_aKatipunan. _936435
942			_cIRC
999			_c88178 _d88178